Comparison of complication rates between anterior versus posterior approaches for treating unstable Hangman's fracture. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Study design: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Objective: To compare the complication rates associated with anterior and posterior approaches for the surgical treatment of unstable hangman's fractures. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to identify comparative studies reporting complications of anterior versus posterior approaches for the treatment of unstable hangman's fractures. Results: The search yielded 1163 papers from which 5 studies were fully included. One hundred fifteen (115) patients were operated on using an anterior approach versus 65 through a posterior approach. The average complication rates for the anterior and posterior approaches were 26.1 % and 13.8 %, respectively. No complications following the anterior approach required pharmacological or surgical intervention (Clavien-Dindo, Grade 1), while 88.9 % of complications following the posterior approach did (Clavien-Dindo, Grade 2). Conclusion: No significant differences in the complication rates were found when comparing anterior versus posterior surgery for treating a C2 traumatic spondylolisthesis. However, most of the complications presented in the posterior surgery group were more severe.

Distal fusion in Duchenne scoliosis: the relevance of preoperative pelvic obliquity. A case series study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine clinical and radiographic outcomes for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion from T2/3 to L5 (without pelvic fixation), at this single centre. METHODS: From January 2012 to January 2020, 29 consecutive DMD scoliosis patients underwent posterior spinal fusion using pedicle screws from T2/3 to L5 in a single center with a minimum of 3 years follow-up (FU). Radiologic measurements and chart review were performed. RESULTS: Twenty nine patients aged 14 ± 1.5 years were included. No patient was lost to FU. All patients had significant correction in Cobb angle, pelvic obliquity (PO) and lumbar lordosis (LL), without loss of correction at last FU. The mean values for preoperative, immediate postoperative and last FU were CA 62o, 15o and 17o, PO: 21o, 8o and 9o; and LL 10o, -41o and -41o respectively. Correction in CA was independent of any variable analysed including implant density, rod diameter, traction, or bone density. Regarding PO, it was inversely related to age and independent of all other variables. Factors associated with postoperative complications were age and respiratory function. CONCLUSIONS: It appears from our results that pelvic fixation might not always be required in DMD scoliosis surgery, when using pedicle screws with lowest instrumented vertebra at L5. However, larger preoperative PO values can be related with residual PO. It seems that probably related to the underlying condition, early surgery may decrease incidence of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Is Indirect Decompression and Fusion More Effective than Direct Decompression and Fusion for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Instability? A Systematic Review and meta-Analysis.

Study design: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Objective: Surgical alternatives to treat lumbar spinal stenosis and instability include indirect (ALIF, OLIF, and LLIF) and direct (TLIF or posterior lumbar interbody fusion) decompression and fusion interventions. Although both approaches have proven to be effective in reducing symptoms, it is unknown if there is any difference in effectiveness between them. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate postoperative pain and disability in patients treated whit indirect vs direct decompression and fusion approaches.Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature consulting several databases and identified studies that enrolled patients diagnosed with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and instability treated with indirect or direct decompression and fusion techniques. Our primary endpoints were the visual analogue scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and the Japanese Orthopedics Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire 1 year after the procedure. Secondary outcomes included complication rate, blood loss, and surgical time.Results: Nine retrospective and comparative studies were included enrolling a total of 1004 participants. Both surgical strategies had satisfactory clinical outcomes with no significant difference at 1 year. Although the complication rate was similar for both groups, the profile of the adverse events was different. In addition, patients treated with indirect decompression and fusion had significantly less blood loss and operative times.Conclusions: Indirect and direct decompression and fusion techniques are similarly effective in treating patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and instability. The ID group had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss and surgical time values.

Setting for single position surgery: survey from expert spinal surgeons.

PURPOSE: To describe a comprehensive setting of the different alternatives for performing a single position fusion surgery based on the opinion of leading surgeons in the field. METHODS: Between April and May of 2021, a specifically designed two round survey was distributed by mail to a group of leaders in the field of Single Position Surgery (SPS). The questionnaire included a variety of domains which were focused on highlighting tips and recommendations regarding improving the efficiency of the performance of SPS. This includes operation room setting, positioning, use of technology, approach, retractors specific details, intraoperative neuromonitoring and tips for inserting percutaneous pedicle screws in the lateral position. It asked questions focused on Lateral Single Position Surgery (LSPS), Lateral ALIF (LA) and Prone Lateral Surgery (PLS). Strong agreement was defined as an agreement of more than 80% of surgeons for each specific question. The number of surgeries performed in SPS by each surgeon was used as an indirect element to aid in exhibiting the expertise of the surgeons being surveyed. RESULTS: Twenty-four surgeons completed both rounds of the questionnaire. Moderate or strong agreement was found for more than 50% of the items. A definition for Single Position Surgery and a step-by-step recommendation workflow was built to create a better understanding of surgeons who are starting the learning curve in this technique. CONCLUSION: A recommendation of the setting for performing single position fusion surgery procedure (LSPS, LA and PLS) was developed based on a survey of leaders in the field.

Spinous Process Splitting Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: 2D Operative Video.

Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis involves an acquired reduction in the spinal canal diameter due to osteoarthritic changes on the disk, facet joints, and ligaments and may result in spinal cord or cauda equina compression.1 This process may lead to pain radiating to the legs, neurogenic claudication, and neurologic deficit. First-line treatment includes conservative care such as physical therapy, spinal injections, and lifestyle changes. If this strategy is insufficient to achieve symptom relief, surgical management is recommended.1,2 Surgery generally encompasses a decompression procedure through a posterior approach. There are several techniques to accomplish this in the context of severe bilateral stenosis including standard open laminectomy, unilateral laminectomy with bilateral decompression, and a tubular approach with bilateral decompression (e.g., "over-the-top technique").2 Among these, the spinous process splitting laminectomy has emerged as a strategy that allows decompressing the spinal canal through a familiar anatomy to the surgeon while respecting paravertebral muscles.3,4 This technique involves exposure of the laminae by cutting through the spinous process and then separating both halves and muscles attached at the sides. The main advantage is that the insertion of these paravertebral soft tissues is preserved, the required retraction is reduced and postoperative pain is decreased.4 Moreover, the learning curve to achieve a successful decompression employing the splitting laminectomy is substantially shorter than with other minimally invasive approaches, such as tubular. This video aims to show the steps to perform this technique (Video 1). We report the case of a 74-year-old male who presented with left sciatica and neurogenic claudication. The images showed multilevel degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, with severe bilateral compression at L4-5, without signs of instability. Surgical alternatives were discussed with the patient, and it was decided to perform an L4-5 spinous process splitting laminectomy. The patient had a good evolution with an unremarkable postoperative course.

Quality Assessment for Reporting Complications and Adverse Events in Spinal Surgery: A Proposed 5-Item Checklist.

BACKGROUND: Reporting complications and/or adverse events after spinal surgical procedures enables the estimation of their prevalence and of their impact on patient outcomes. However, the documentation of complications is relatively infrequent and highly heterogeneous. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of complication and adverse event reporting in spinal surgery literature. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature from 5 international, peer-reviewed, indexed spinal journals was performed. Included studies were published between January and December 2020 and reported the surgical results of spinal procedures. Data on the level of evidence and study design were collected and analyzed as well as whether the studies were single-center or multicenter studies. The quality of complication reports was evaluated through a 5-item checklist, with 5 questions divided into 3 parts: definition, evaluation, and report. RESULTS: Complications associated with spinal surgical procedures were reported in 292 studies. According to the level of evidence, significantly higher reporting quality was seen in level I and II studies compared with level III and IV studies (P = 0.003). Regarding the 5-item checklist, 49% (143/292) of studies fulfilled the definition section, 16.4% (48/292) fulfilled the evaluation section, and 92% (270/292) fulfilled the report section. CONCLUSIONS: Overall quality assessment when reporting complications in surgical spinal studies showed that only 13% (38/292) of publications that reported complications as part of the outcomes exhibited all items of the 5-item checklist. Additionally, significantly better reports were observed in level I studies compared with level II-IV studies.

Vertebral augmentation plus short-segment fixation versus vertebral augmentation alone in Kümmell's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures of the thoracolumbar spine can progress to Kümmell's disease, an avascular vertebral osteonecrosis. Vertebral augmentation (VA)-vertebroplasty and/or kyphoplasty-is the main treatment modality, but additional short-segment fixation (SSF) has been recommended concomitant to VA. The aim is to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of VA + SSF versus VA alone. Systematic review, including comparative articles in Kümmell's disease, was performed. This study assessed the following outcome measurements: visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), anterior vertebral height (AVH), local kyphotic angle (LKA), operative time, blood loss, length of stay, and cement leakage. Six retrospective studies were included, with 126 patients in the VA + SSF group and 152 in VA alone. Pooled analysis showed the following: VAS, non-significant difference favoring VA + SSF: MD -0.61, 95% CI (-1.44, 0.23), I2 91%, p = 0.15; ODI, non-significant difference favoring VA + SSF: MD -9.85, 95% CI (-19.63, -0.07), I2 96%, p = 0.05; AVH, VA + SSF had a non-significant difference over VA alone: MD -3.21 mm, 95% CI (-7.55, 1.14), I2 92%, p = 0.15; LKA, non-significant difference favoring VA + SSF: MD -0.85°, 95% CI (-5.10, 3.40), I2 95%, p = 0.70. There were higher operative time, blood loss, and hospital length of stay for VA + SSF (p < 0.05), but with lower cement leakage (p < 0.05). VA + SFF and VA alone are effective treatment modalities in Kümmell's disease. VA + SSF may provide superior long-term results in clinical and radiological outcomes but required a longer length of stay.

Reporting Complications in Spinal Surgery-a Systematic Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Many efforts are expended to improve health care quality in the surgical treatment of spinal conditions. However, the prevalence of reporting complications in spinal surgeries is highly heterogeneous, which is partially due to the lack of a universal and comprehensive system. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed in 5 international and indexed spine journals from January to December 2020. All clinical studies that had surgical procedures in any spinal region were classified according to level of evidence, study design, category of spinal condition, and primary outcome. The prevalence and quality of complication reporting were evaluated through a checklist. RESULTS: Of 455 articles screened, complications were reported in 64.2% (292 articles). A significant higher prevalence of reports was observed in randomized compared with nonrandomized studies (P < 0.05). In 89 articles, at least 1 classification was used to report complications, with 12 different classification systems employed in the total sample. Timing to record complications was as follows: 47 (16.1%) articles reported complications at 30 days, 31 (10.6%) reported complications at 90 days, and 88 (30.1%) reported complications during all follow-ups. In 126 (43.1%) articles, complications were not mentioned. CONCLUSIONS: Almost one-third of spine surgical studies did not report complications in their results despite reporting clinical outcomes. The evidence quality of the study was directly related with the reporting of complications. A high heterogeneity regarding complication reporting was seen in the literature.

Single-Position Surgery versus Lateral-Then-Prone-Position Circumferential Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Literature Review.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the outcomes of single-position (SP) circumferential lumbar interbody fusion in lateral decubitus versus dual-position (DP) fusion. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to identify comparative studies reporting the outcomes of SP lumbar interbody fusion versus DP. For risk of bias assessment, the ROBINS-I (risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions) tool was used. RESULTS: Four comparative studies were included from an initial search of 3780 papers. All 4 studies were retrospective cohort studies comparing outcomes of SP versus DP LLIF. A total of 349 patients were operated using SP versus 254 using DP. All studies involved reported operating time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, change in segmental lordosis, and complications. From a general perspective, baseline variables were similar in both groups in all the studies and all reported a significant decrease in operative time and length of stays with SP. CONCLUSIONS: Literature comparing SP versus lateral-then-prone lumbar fusion shows a tendency toward shorter operating time and hospital stays in SP lumbar fusion while maintaining similar perioperative outcomes.

A Novel Low-Cost Exoscopy Station for Training Neurosurgeons and Neurosurgery Trainees.

BACKGROUND: The loss of stereopsis and the need for markedly enhanced hand-eye coordination are obstacles to overcome when performing exoscopic procedures, but both should improve with training. Our objectives were to describe an exoscopy training station and to compare time and performance of a given microsurgical technique among neurosurgery residents and junior neurosurgeons. METHODS: We designed a low-cost exoscopy training station featuring a notebook computer, a webcam, and a light-emitting diode source. Surgeons and surgical trainees with no experience in exoscopy were enrolled and divided into 2 groups (trainees and controls). Performance and time in suture placement were evaluated by a skilled observer in both groups at baseline and 3 days later. Between evaluations, trainees completed an exoscopy training module. RESULTS: There were 22 participants divided equally into 2 groups. At baseline, trainees had a greater percentage of proper sutures than controls (58% vs. 35%), but they were also slower (32 minutes vs. 25 minutes). On final evaluation, not only were trainees approximately 14 minutes faster than at baseline (P = 0,03), but also their successful suture rate had increased by 18% (final rate 76%, P = 0.02). Moreover, controls were faster compared with baseline by 6 minutes (P = 0.003), but their percentage of successful sutures did not increase (final rate 38%, P = 0.49). The change from baseline to final evaluation favored trainees for both outcomes (P = 0.03 and P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Using the exoscopy training station, the trainees were able to improve their time and performance of exoscopy compared with the controls.

COVID-19 Impact Among Spine Surgeons in Latin America.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak in spine surgeons in Latin America. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to Latin American spine surgeons from April 4 to 6, 2020. Surgeon characteristics were recorded. The impact of COVID-19 on economic well-being, work, and mental health were also determined. All variables were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: Two hundred four surgeons answered the complete survey; most of them were male (96.6%), the average age was 47.7 years; 58.8% (n = 120) were orthopedic surgeons and 41.2% (n = 84) were neurosurgeons. The majority of the respondents were from Argentina (59.8%, n = 122), followed by Brazil (17.2%, n = 35), Chile (6.4%, n = 13), and Mexico (5.9%, n = 12). Most of the surgeons reported performing emergency procedures only during the pandemic (76.5%, n = 156). Half used telemedicine or online consultation modalities (54.4%, n = 111). The average concern about the financial situation due to the pandemic was 7.53 in a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being the worst scenario). Twenty-two percent (n = 45) of the surgeons had a score over 10 in the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; scores higher than 10 needs referral to confirm depression diagnosis). Young age and neurosurgery as a specialty were associated with higher PHQ-9 scores. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 has an impact in the daily working practice and financial situation of spine surgeons in Latin America. The long-term psychological impact should be taken into consideration to avoid a heavier burden for health care providers.

Impacto psicosocial de la pandemia por COVID-19 en cirujanos de columna argentinos / Psychosocial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Argentine spinal surgeons

Objetivo: Evaluar el impacto psicosocial de la pandemia por COVID-19 en los cirujanos de columna de Argentina. Material y métodos: Se envió un cuestionario diseñado específicamente a los cirujanos de columna de Argentina entre el 4-6 de abril del 2020. Las preguntas incluyeron variables demográficas, económicas, laborales y la escala de depresión PHQ-9. Las variables fueron comparadas y analizadas y las diferencias estadísticamente significativas remarcadas. Resultados: Respondieron en forma completa la encuesta 122 cirujanos de columna de Argentina, la mayoría hombres (97%), la edad promedio fue de 44 años; la mitad (n: 61) eran traumatólogos y la otra mitad neurocirujanos. La mayoría respondieron estar solo haciendo cirugías de emergencia (84%, n: 102). La preocupación promedio respecto a la situación financiera fue de 7.8 en una escala de 1 al 10. El 20% (n: 24) tenía un score superior a 10 en la escala de PHQ-9. Los cirujanos más jóvenes y los neurocirujanos tenían estadísticamente scores de PHQ-9 más altos. Conclusión: Se evaluó el impacto durante la pandemia por COVID-19 en la situación laboral y financiera de los cirujanos de columna encuestados. El impacto psicológico en el largo plazo debe ser considerado, para evitar secuelas en este grupo de profesionales de la salud.

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the psycho-social impact of the COVID-19 outbreak in spine surgeons in Argentina. Methods: A questionnaire was sent to Argentina spine surgeons from April 4-6th, 2020. Questions regarding demographics, economic, working status and the PHQ-9 score were included. All variables were compared, analyzed and statistically significant differences were recorded. Results: 122 surgeons from Argentina answered the complete survey, most of them were male (97 %), the average age was 44 years; half (n: 61) of them were orthopedic surgeons and half neurosurgeons. Most of the surgeons reported performing emergency procedures only during the pandemic (84 %, n: 102). The average concern about the financial situation due to the pandemic was 7.8 in a scale of 1 to 10. Twenty percent (n: 24) of the surgeons had a score over 10 in the PHQ-9. Young age and neurosurgery as a specialty were statistically related with higher PHQ-9 scores. Conclusions: COVID-19 impact ́s in working practice and financial situation of Argentina ́s spine surgeons that answered this survey was evaluated. The long-term psychological impact should be taken into consideration to avoid a heavier burden for health care providers.

Access to Technology and Education for the Development of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Techniques in Latin America.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate access to the technologies and education needed to perform minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) in Latin America. METHODS: We designed a questionnaire to evaluate surgeons' practice characteristics, access to different technologies, and training opportunities for MISS techniques. The survey was sent to members and registered users of AO Spine Latin from January 6-20, 2020. The major variables studied were nationality, specialty (orthopedics or neurosurgery), level of hospital (primary, secondary, tertiary), number of surgeries performed per year by the spine surgeon, types of spinal pathologies commonly managed, and number of MISS performed per year. Other variables involved specific access to different technologies: intraoperative fluoroscopy, percutaneous screws, cages, tubular retractors, microscopy, intraoperative computed tomography, neuronavigation imaging, and bone morphogenetic protein. Finally, participants were asked about main obstacles to performing MISS and their access to education on MISS techniques in their region. RESULTS: The questionnaires were answered by 306 members of AO Spine Latin America across 20 different countries. Most answers were obtained from orthopedic surgeons (57.8%) and those with over 10 years of experience (42.4%). Most of the surgeons worked in private practice (46.4%) and performed >50 surgeries per year (44.1%), but only 13.7% performed >50 MISS per year, mainly to manage degenerative pathologies (87.5%). Most surgeons always had access to fluoroscopy (79%). Only 26% always had access to percutaneous screws, 24% to tubular retractors, 34.3% to cages (anterior lumbar interbody fusion, lateral lumbar interbody fusion, or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion), and 43% to microscopy. Regarding technologies, 71% reported never having access to navigation, 83% computed tomography, and 69.3% bone morphogenetic protein. The main limitations expressed for widely used MISS technologies were the high implant costs (69.3%) and high navigation costs (49.3%). Most surgeons claimed access to online education activities (71%), but only 44.9% reported access to face-to-face events and 28.8% to hands-on activities, their limited access largely because the courses were expensive (62.7%) or few courses were available on MISS in their region (51.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Most surgeons in Latin America have limited resources to perform MISS, even in private practice. The main constraints are implant costs, access to technologies, and limited face-to-face educational opportunities.

Barriers of neurophysiology monitoring in spine surgery: Latin America experience.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM) has become valuable in spine surgery. Unfortunately, it is not always available in many spine centers, especially in developing countries. Our aim was to evaluate the accessibility and barriers to IOM in spine surgery in Latin America. METHODS: We designed a questionnaire to evaluate the characteristics of surgeons and their opinions on the usefulness of IOM for different spine operations. The survey was sent to 9616 members and registered users of AO Spine Latin America (AOSLA) from August 1, 2019, to August 21, 2019. Major variables studied included nationality, years of experience, specialty (orthopedics or neurosurgery), level of complexity of the hospital, number of spine surgeries performed per year by the spine surgeon, the types of spinal pathologies commonly managed, and how important IOM was to the individual surgeon. General questions to evaluate use included accessibility, limitations of IOM usage, management of IOM changes, and the legal value of IOM. The results were analyzed and compared between neurosurgeon and orthopedics, level of surgeon experience, and country of origin. RESULTS: Questionnaires were answered by 200 members of AOSLA from 16 different countries. The most common responses were obtained from orthopedic surgeons (62%), those with more than 10 years of practice (54%); majority of surgeons performed more than 50 spine surgeries per year (69%) and treated mainly spine degenerative diseases (76%). Most surgeons think that IOM has a real importance during surgeries (92%) and not just a legal value. Although surgeons mostly considered IOM essential to scoliosis surgery in adolescents (70%), thoracolumbar kyphosis correction (68%), and intramedullary tumors (68%), access to IOM was limited to 57% for economic reasons. Of interest, in 64% of cases, where IOM was available and significant change occurred, the actual operative procedures were significantly altered. CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that 68% of spine surgeons believe IOM to be indispensable for complex spine surgery, cost remains the main barrier to its use/availability in Latin America.

Partial Sacrectomy for Resection of a Sacral Chordoma: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Sacral chordomas are infrequent tumors that arise from remnants of the notochord. They are most often found in the sacrum and skull-base.1,2 These lesions rarely metastasize and usually have an indolent and oligosymptomatic clinical course. Chordomas show low sensitivity to standard radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Operative resection with wide resection margins offers the best long-term prognosis, including longer survival and local control.1,3 However, achieving a complete resection with oncological margins may be difficult because of the anatomic complexity of the sacrococcygeal region.4 The main complications of sacral resection include infections, wound closure defects, and anorectal and urogenital dysfunction. The rate of these complications is significantly increased when the tumor involves the S2 level or above. We report the case of a 64-yr-old male who presented with progressive sacrococcygeal pain and a feeling of incomplete evacuation. A heterogeneous, osteolytic lesion was found at the sacrococcygeal region. Full body imaging tests were negative for other lesions. A computed tomography (CT) guided biopsy was made. We usually use the midline approach in case we have to include the needle path in the resection. The pathology confirmed a sacrococcygeal, low-grade chordoma. We decided to perform an en bloc resection. A posterior, partial sacrectomy was planned distal to the S4 level.

Neurosurgery versus orthopedic surgery: Who has better access to minimally invasive spinal technology?

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate differences in neurosurgeons versus orthopedists access to technologies needed to perform minimally invasive spine surgeries (MISS) in Latin America. METHODS: We sent a survey to members of AO Spine Latin America (January 2020), and assessed the following variables; nationality, level of hospital (primary, secondary, and tertiary), number of spinal operations performed per year, spinal pathologies addressed, the number of minimally invasive spine operations performed/year, and differences in access to MISS spinal technology between neurosurgeons and orthopedists. RESULTS: Responses were returned from 306 (25.6) members of AO Spine Latin America representing 20 different countries; 57.8% of respondents were orthopedic surgeons and 42.4% had over 10 years of experience. Although both specialties reported a lack of access to most of the technologies, the main difference between the two was greater utilization/access of neurosurgeons to operating microscope (e.g., 84% of the neurosurgeons vs. 39% of orthopedic spine surgeons). CONCLUSION: Although both specialties have limited access to MISS spinal technologies, orthopedic spine surgeons reported significantly lower access to operating microscopes versus neurosurgeons (P < 0.01).

Cirugía mínimamente invasiva en el tratamiento de fracturas tóracolumbares / Minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures

Objetivo: Analizar y describir una serie de fracturas tóraco-lumbares traumáticas tratadas con cirugía mínimamente invasiva. Material y métodos: Analizamos una serie de 26 pacientes con fracturas traumáticas tóraco-lumbosacras entre 2010-2017. Las imágenes pre-operatorias fueron clasificadas usando la clasificación AO. Analizamos en forma pre y post operatoria: escala visual analógica, volumen de pérdida sanguínea, duración de la hospitalización, complicaciones, cirugías asociadas en otros órganos, extracción de implantes en el largo plazo, estado neurológico pre y post quirúrgico y mortalidad.Los pacientes con historias clínicas completas, TAC pre-operatoria y un seguimiento mínimo de 12 meses fueron incluidos (18 hombres y 8 mujeres). La edad promedio fue de 28.7 años (21-84 años); seguimiento promedio de 28 meses (13-86 meses). Dieciocho pacientes fueron manejados con instrumentaciones percutáneas, 8 recibieron vertebroplastias, y en 5 casos se realizó además algún gesto de artrodesis. Resultados: La EVA mejoró 7 puntos promedio respecto al pre-operatorio; el promedio de sangrado fue de 40 mL, no observamos ningún caso de empeoramiento neurológico. La duración promedio de la hospitalización fue de 3.9 días. Cuatro enfermos necesitaron alguna cirugía en otro órgano producto de sus politraumatismos.Los tornillos percutáneos fueron removidos en 9 casos luego de la consolidación. Como complicaciones tuvimos: 1 hematoma retroperitoneal autolimitado, una fractura pedicular y una cánula de cementación rota adentro de un pedículo. Conclusión: La cirugía mínimamente invasiva en trauma espinal es una alternativa válida que permite estabilización, movilización precoz y logra buenos resultados en términos de control del dolor con baja tasa de complicaciones

Objective: To analyze and describe a series of trauma-related thoraco-lumbo-sacral vertebral fractures managed with minimally invasive surgery. Methods: We retrospectively review the charts and images of 26 patients with thoracolumbar spine fractures between 2010-2017. Pre-op images were assessed and fractures were classified according to the thoraco-lumbar trauma AO Spine classification. We analyzed pre and post-surgical visual analog scale (VAS), blood loss during surgery, hospital length of stay, complications, associated surgical procedures, long term post-op implant removal, pre and post neurological status and mortality.Patients with a complete case record, pre-op CT scans and minimum 12-month follow up were included (18 males and 8 females). Mean age was 28.7 years (21-84 years); mean post-op follow up was 28 month (13-86 months). Eighteen patients were managed with percutaneous instrumentation, 8 patients also received percutaneous vertebroplasty, and 5 patients underwent also some arthrodesis procedure. Results: VAS improved 7 points as compared to the pre-op score; mean blood loss was 40 mL, we did not observed any neurological deficit worsening. Mean hospital length of stay was 3.9 days. Four patients needed surgical procedures involving other organs due to politrauma. Percutaneous screws were removed in 9 cases after fracture consolidation. Complications were: one case of self-limiting retroperitoneal hematoma, one case of pedicle screw fracture and one cement broken cannula into the pedicle. Conclusion: Minimally invasive surgery in spine trauma is a valid option allowing stabilization, early mobilization, and leading to good outcomes in terms of pain control and a lower complication rate

Anatomía de las osteotomías dorsolumbares en fotografías en 3D / Anatomy of thoracolumbar osteotomies in 3D photographs

Introducción y objetivo: Existe evidencia contundente que demuestra la relación entre el balance sagital y la calidad de vida de los pacientes adultos con deformidad espinal, de manera que la corrección y realineación en ese plano se ha transformado en un objetivo primario en el tratamiento quirúrgico de dichas afecciones. Las osteotomías dorsolumbares permiten liberar el raquis para realizar dicha realineación sin el uso de fuerza indebida. Sin embargo, son técnicas complejas y con alta tasa de complicaciones intra y post operatorias. Teniendo en cuenta que el conocimiento anatómico de dichos procedimientos es clave, el objetivo de esta revisión consiste en realizar una descripción de las osteotomías dorsolumbares mediante el uso de fotografías en 3D de un preparado cadavérico de raquis lumbar. Materiales y métodos: Se utilizó un preparado cadavérico formolizado de raquis lumbar. Se realizaron las osteotomías espinales lumbares según la clasificación de Schwab et al., en los segmentos L3 y L4. Se tomaron imágenes fotográficas en 3 dimensiones utilizando equipo Nikon D90, con lente 50 mm Af 1.8G, flash Nikon SB700, y una barra regulable para fotografía 3D. Las imágenes fotográficas obtenidas fueron procesadas con los siguientes softwares con técnica anaglífica: Anaglyph Maker versión 1.08 y StereoPhoto Maker versión 4.54. Resultados: Se realiza una descripción de las osteotomías según la clasificación en 6 grados anatómicos de Schwab y colaboradores. Conclusión: La utilización de la técnica fotográfica 3D permitió demostrar el tipo y magnitud de resección ósea necesaria en cada grado de osteotomía.

Introduction and objective: There is strong evidence that shows the relationship between the sagittal balance and the quality of life of adult patients with spinal deformity. According to that, the correction and realignment of the sagittal plane has become a primary objective in the surgical treatment of these conditions. The dorsolumbar osteotomies allow the spine to be released, in order to perform that realignment without the use of undue force. However, they are complex techniques, with a high rate of intra and post-operative complications. Taking into account that the anatomical knowledge of these procedures is fundamental, the objective of this review was to describe the dorsolumbar osteotomies using 3D photographs of a cadaveric preparation of the lumbar spine. Materials and methods: A cadaveric formolized lumbar spine preparation was used. Lumbar spinal osteotomies were performed according to the classification of Schwab et al. Three-dimensional photographic images were taken using Nikon D90 equipment, with a 50mm AF 1.8G lens, Nikon SB700 flash, and an adjustable bar for 3D photography. The photographic images obtained were processed with the following software with anaglyphic technique: Anaglyph Maker version 1.08 and StereoPhoto Maker version 4.54. Results: A description of the osteotomies was made, according to the 6 anatomic grades classification developed by Schwab et al. Conclusion: The use of the 3D photographic technique allowed to demonstrate the type and magnitude of bone resection needed in each degree of osteotomy.

Atrofia paraespinal postoperatoria. ¿El abordaje importa? / Postoperative paraspinal atrophy. Does boarding matter?

Objetivo: Comparar la magnitud de la atrofia muscular postoperatoria que producen tres abordajes en fusiones lumbares segmentarias para patología degenerativa (línea media vs. Wiltse vs. MIS TLIF). Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, transversal, multicéntrico, descriptivo y retrospectivo, de una serie de pacientes operados por patología degenerativa lumbar. Analizamos 45 pacientes (24 mujeres), con una edad media de 58.7 años, operados en 5 centros quirúrgicos entre 2015 y 2018. Se realizó una fusión instrumentada de un nivel, desde L3 hasta S1 (7 casos L3-L4, 25 casos L4-L5 y 13 casos L5-S1). Quince casos fueron realizados por abordajes por línea media, 15 por abordaje de Wiltse y 15 MIS TLIF. Todos fueron estudiados con Resonancia Magnética preoperatoria y con un mínimo de 6 meses luego de la cirugía (media de 14.6 meses). Estas fueron analizadas por 3 observadores especialistas en cirugía de columna. Se tomaron 2 variables para comparar el grado de atrofia entre pre y postoperatorio: área de sección transversal (AST) de músculo multifidus (MM) y erectores espinales (EE) y grado de infiltración grasa (IG) mediante la clasificación visual de Kjaer. Los análisis realizados fueron ejecutados utilizando el programa estadístico RStudio (versión 1.1.383) y se compararon valores de p obtenidos mediante la suma de rangos de Wilcoxon. Resultados: No se encontraron diferencias significativas entre los distintos abordajes en relación a la atrofia del MM. La comparación de p para AST de los EE mostró diferencias entre MIS TLIF vs línea media (p 0.018) y de línea media vs Wiltse (p 0.027). Conclusión: Los abordajes mínimamente invasivos utilizados para descompresión y artrodesis monosegmentaria lumbar, tuvieron más impacto sobre la atrofia muscular en los EE que en MM. Estudios randomizados y controlados serían de utilidad para validar los resultados de este trabajo.

Aim: To compare the level of post-operative muscle atrophy associated with three different approaches to achieve segmental lumbar fusion in patients with degenerative back disease: (1) the standard midline approach; (2) Wiltse's minimally-invasive surgery (MIS-W) approach; and (3) minimal-invasive surgery (MIS) with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). Methods and Materials: A multi-center, observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study was performed on a series of patients who had undergone surgery for degenerative lumbar disease. All patients were studied preoperatively and for at least six months post-operatively (mean follow-up: 14.6 months) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), all images analyzed by three spine-imaging specialists. Three variables were used to compare the level of atrophy before and after surgery: (1) the cross sectional area (CSA) of the multifidus muscle (MM); (2) the CSA of the spinal erector muscles (SEM); and (3) fat infiltration level, as rated per the Kjaer visual classification system. Inter-group differences in these three outcomes were assessed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Results: Forty-five patients (24 females), of mean age 58.7 years, underwent surgery at five participating surgical centers between 2015 and 2018. One-level instrumented fusion, from L3 to S1, was performed: at the L3-L4 level in seven patients, L4-L5 in 25, and L5-S1 in 13. Surgical access was split evenly between the three approaches, each performed in 15 patients. No significant differences were detected between the approaches, in terms of MM atrophy or fat infiltration level. Less CSA-SEM atrophy was detected with the MIS-TLIF than midline (p = 0.018), and with the MIS-W than midline (p = 0.027) approach. Conclusions: Relative to the standard midline approach, two minimally-invasive surgery approaches used for decompression and lumbar mono-segmental arthrodesis reduced atrophy in the spinal erector muscles, but not the multifidus muscle. Randomized controlled trials might be useful to validate the results of this investigation.

Vancomicina tópica en la prevención de infecciones tempranas en cirugías instrumentadas espinales: serie de casos y revisión de la literatura / Topical vancomycin in the prevention of early infections in instrumented spinal surgeries: case series and literature review

Objetivo: Evaluar la eficacia de la vancomicina tópica en la disminución de las infecciones tempranas (agudas y subagudas) en cirugías de columna instrumentadas por vía posterior. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, multicéntrico, retrospectivo, descriptivo y comparativo de 125 pacientes con cirugías instrumentadas de columna torácica o lumbar operados entre abril y agosto del 2016. En 68 casos se colocó 1 gr de vancomicina tópica, y en 57 no, en forma no aleatorizada, según la preferencia de cada cirujano. Se realizó un seguimiento clínico durante los primeros 90 días postquirúrgicos en pesquisa de signos de infección. Se analizó mediante el programa SPSS versión 24 la estadística inferencial utilizando el test estadístico de Chi2 para la comparación de variables cualitativas entre ambos grupos y para comparación de medias de variables cuantitativas el test estadístico t de Student. La edad media fue de 45,2 años, mientras que 60,8 eran del sexo masculino. El 23% fueron operados de un nivel, 41,6% de dos, 12% de tres y el resto de más niveles. Resultados: La prevalencia para infección de herida quirúrgica fue de 1.5% en el grupo que recibió vancomicina y de 5.3% en el grupo control (p 0,24). Los factores asociados a la presentación de infecciones fueron la edad, las instrumentaciones de más de 6 niveles y la prolongación del tiempo quirúrgico con valores positivos para Chi2, aunque no se pudieron determinar valores de p para significancia estadística. Conclusión: Las infecciones tempranas en instrumentaciones de columna de nuestra serie mostraron una disminución asociada a la aplicación de vancomicina tópica en el cierre del lecho quirúrgico, aunque esta diferencia no fue estadísticamente significativa.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of vancomycin powder to decrease the incidence of infections following instrumented posterior spine surgery. Materials and methods: An observational, multicenter case-cohort study was performed involving 125 patients undergoing instrumented thoracic and lumbar spine surgery between April and August 2016. Mean patient age was 45.2 years and 60.8% were male. The most prevalent condition was degenerative spine disease (62.4%). In a non-randomized way, 1g of vancomycin was administered topically to 68 patients, while the remaining 57 patients received no antibiotic treatment. Patients were followed for three months post-operatively. Patients who received and did not receive Vancomycin were statistically compared, using Pearson χ2 analysis or Fisher's Exact tests for categorical variables and unpaired Student's t tests for continuous variables. All analyses were two-tailed, with p ≤ 0.05 set as the criterion for statistical significance. Results: The incidence of surgical site infections was 5.3% among controls and 1.5% in those administered vancomycin (p = 0.24). No other inter-group differences ­ between the two treatment groups or between those with versus without an infection ­ were significant. Conclusions: The incidence of early surgical-site infections, both acute and subacute, was three-fold less in those given vancomycin powder; however, this difference was not statistically significant.